FARE GAME: How European cities are using incentives to persuade people to take the bus

If you want people to ride the bus, build a bus people actually want to ride -then add a reward. Across Europe, cities and regions are experimenting with incentives that nudge travellers away from the car: from full fare waivers and rock-bottom flat fares to points systems, lotteries and employer mobility budgets. The aims are familiar territory - unclog roads, cut emissions, broaden access - but the tactics are varied, inventive, incentivised and sometimes counterintuitive.

For example, in Scotland some years ago pregnant drug addicts were “persuaded” to travel to get their regular treatment by the incentive of a free coffee after the first three trips. It doesn’t have to be a complicated system.

Here’s a snapshot of what’s working, who’s paying, and what other cities can learn.

Free for residents: Tallinn’s radical social contract

(Credit: Wirestock/Dreamstime.com) 

The Estonian capital Tallinn made headlines when it became one of the first major European capitals to offer free public transport to residents. Launched in 2013, the policy gives anyone registered as a Tallinn resident access to trams, buses and trains without paying a fare; the city recoups costs through taxation and other revenue measures. The upfront logic is simple: make transit the default option for urban mobility and discourage driving by making it comparatively costly (for example, through higher parking fees). Tallinn’s scheme is often cited as a model for increasing ridership and encouraging residents to register with the city.
 

The Estonian capital Tallinn made headlines when it became one of the first major European capitals to offer free public transport to residents in 2013

National-scale free travel: Luxembourg’s bold move

Luxembourg took that logic even further. In March 2020 the country abolished fares for all public transport across the entire national network. The policy was driven by congestion, cross-border commuting flows and climate commitments, and it removed cost as a barrier to using public transport for both residents and visitors. The result: simplified travel choices and an easier case for people to opt out of car trips. Critics point out funding and redistribution questions remain; supporters see it as a clear lever for modal shift.
 

(Credit: Alena Kravchenko/Dreamstime.com) 
 

Cheap, ubiquitous and viral: Germany’s flat-rate experiments

Germany’s summer 2022 “€9 ticket” - a temporary nationwide monthly pass - showed that steep price reductions can trigger massive, rapid increases in public transport use. The scheme was followed by the “Deutschlandticket,” a permanently cheaper subscription for regional and local services rolled out at a higher monthly price but still affordable to attract regular users. These initiatives proved demand elastic: when price barriers fall, ridership spikes. They also raised questions about sustainable financing: who pays for the revenue gap;’ and about capacity: can networks cope with newfound demand without upgrades?
 

Time-shifting and lotteries: Singapore’s off-peak nudges (and European echoes)

While Asian cities have led on demand-management nudges, European pilots have borrowed similar ideas: reward travellers who avoid peak times. Singapore’s “Travel Smart” lotteries - rewarding off-peak travellers with cash or prizes through randomised draws - showed how gamification-based incentives can spread demand across the day. European pilots and employer programmes have experimented with similar time-shifting incentives, using financial or fringe benefits to smooth peaks and improve system efficiency. (Where implemented locally, such measures often pair with dynamic pricing or employer-led mobility budgets.)

 

(Credit: Jia Wang Kun/Dreamstime.com) 
 

Singapore’s “Travel Smart” lotteries - rewarding off-peak travellers with cash or prizes through randomised draws - showed how gamification-based incentives can spread demand across the day

Employer-led solutions: mobility budgets and benefits

In the Netherlands, Germany and parts of Scandinavia, employers are shifting from car allowances to flexible mobility budgets - cash sums employees can spend on public transport, bike shares, e-scooters or even micro-mobility subscriptions. These budgets make sustainable options financially attractive while removing the default assumption that a company car is the perk of choice. They’re also administratively savvy: instead of building a bespoke incentive scheme, organisations offer choice and let their employees’ self-select greener options.
 

On-demand and mode-switch incentives: Sofia and beyond

Some initiatives are less about price and more about convenience. EU-funded pilots in cities such as Sofia, Bulgaria, have focused on on-demand green buses and integrated trip planning - rewarding users who replace car trips with flexible public alternatives through targeted fare reductions and promotional pricing. The principle: make bus travel as convenient as ride-hailing and reward the switch.


(Credit: Sanga Park/Dreamstime.com) 
 

What the incentives need in order to succeed

Success stories reveal a common truth: incentives work best when they’re part of a package. Fare waivers and points generate ridership only if services are reliable, frequent and comfortable. Four lessons emerge:

1. Pair money with service quality. Ridership spikes strain networks; long-term success needs capacity planning and investment.
2. Design for equity. Free or cheap travel can be progressive - but only if targeted to those who benefit most. Residency requirements (such as in Tallinn) or residency-based registration can skew who actually benefits.
3. Finance transparently. Who pays for the subsidy matters politically and practically. Schemes that can show local economic returns build broader support.
4. Keep digital inclusion in mind. App-based rewards risk excluding those without smartphones; analogue options and outreach are essential.
    

Fare waivers and points generate ridership only if services are reliable, frequent and comfortable

The policy horizon: from experiments to systems

The European picture is now a patchwork of radical ideas and cautious pilots. Some cities (Luxembourg, Tallinn) have chosen to remove fares entirely. Others test behavioural nudges and retail partnerships. National or regional flat-rate passes show price alone can change habits, but long-term success depends on funding and operations. As climate goals sharpen and cities wrestle with congestion, more municipalities will have to decide: tax more, subsidise travel, or redesign cities so the bus and the people on it is the natural centre of mobility.
 

Incentives are a tool, not a cure. But used smartly to lower barriers, spread benefits and pair with better services they can tilt daily choices toward public transport

In the end, incentives are a tool, not a cure. But used smartly to lower barriers, spread benefits and pair with better services they can tilt daily choices toward public transport. And if that happens at scale, the payoff is not just fuller buses but cleaner air, healthier streets and cities that run on people, not petrol.